FIFA welcomes T&T Court of Appeal victory over TTFA » EntornoInteligente /

Foot­ball’s world gov­ern­ing body, FI­FA, on Sat­ur­day hailed the Trinidad and To­ba­go Court of Ap­peal de­ci­sion to squash a re­cent High Court rul­ing against them, in the con­tro­ver­sial case brought by the em­bat­tled T&T Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (TTFA).

Ear­li­er this month, Jus­tice Car­ol Gob­in ruled in favour of be­lea­guered TTFA pres­i­dent, William Wal­lace and his three vice pres­i­dents — Clynt Tay­lor, Joseph Sam Phillips, and Su­san Joseph-War­rick (re­signed), con­tend­ing that the nor­mal­i­sa­tion com­mit­tee in­stalled on March 27 by FI­FA “was un­war­rant­ed and in­de­fen­si­ble” and al­so “made in bad faith and for an im­prop­er and il­le­gal mo­tive”. FI­FA had re­moved the TTFA ex­ec­u­tive on March 17 af­ter their au­dit vis­it in Feb­ru­ary.

How­ev­er, FI­FA on Fri­day won their case in the Court of Ap­peal with Chief Jus­tice Ivor Archie and Jus­tice of Ap­peal Nolan Bereaux con­clud­ing that Wal­lace and his TTFA ex­ec­u­tive mem­bers had vi­o­lat­ed the TTFA’s con­sti­tu­tion by chal­leng­ing FI­FA’s de­ci­sion in the lo­cal courts in­stead of be­fore the Court of Ar­bi­tra­tion for Sport.

On Sat­ur­day in a me­dia re­lease FI­FA stat­ed: “FI­FA wel­comes the de­ci­sion of the Trinidad and To­ba­go Court of Ap­peal, which ruled that the for­mer lead­er­ship of the Trinidad and To­ba­go Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (TTFA) had act­ed un­law­ful­ly by ap­peal­ing to a lo­cal court to con­test the ap­point­ment of a nor­mal­i­sa­tion com­mit­tee for the TTFA.”

The re­lease con­tin­ued: “Among oth­er rel­e­vant le­gal con­sid­er­a­tions, the Court of Ap­peal stressed that in ac­cor­dance with the TTFA statutes and the FI­FA statutes, the Court of Ar­bi­tra­tion for Sports (CAS) is the prop­er fo­rum to re­solve such dis­putes. The rul­ing, which has been served to the par­ties yes­ter­day (Fri­day), ful­ly recog­nis­es the es­tab­lished glob­al foot­ball gov­er­nance struc­ture, which re­lies on the CAS as the ex­clu­sive in­ter­na­tion­al­ly recog­nised tri­bunal for the res­o­lu­tion of sports-re­lat­ed dis­putes.”

It con­tin­ued: “A nor­mal­i­sa­tion com­mit­tee was in­stalled in Trinidad and To­ba­go by a de­ci­sion of the FI­FA Coun­cil af­ter it was es­tab­lished that the for­mer lead­er­ship of the TTFA had en­gaged in var­i­ous acts of se­ri­ous mis­man­age­ment. The for­mer lead­er­ship of TTFA lodged a claim be­fore the lo­cal Courts in Trinidad and To­ba­go in or­der to con­test the de­ci­sion of the FI­FA Coun­cil. Yes­ter­day’s de­ci­sion of the Court of Ap­peal over­turns the first-in­stance de­ci­sion of the Lo­cal Court and con­cludes that should the for­mer lead­er­ship of TTFA wish to dis­pute the ap­point­ment of the nor­mal­i­sa­tion com­mit­tee it should ap­peal to CAS.”

The lat­est move al­lows FI­FA to pro­ceed with the nor­mal­i­sa­tion com­mit­tee head­ed by lo­cal busi­ness­man Robert Hadad and in­cludes at­tor­ney Judy Daniel and re­tired banker Nigel Ro­mano, which was put in place last March be­cause of what FI­FA claimed were “ex­treme­ly low over­all fi­nan­cial man­age­ment meth­ods, com­bined with a mas­sive debt”, leav­ing the TTFA “fac­ing a very re­al risk of in­sol­ven­cy and illiq­uid­i­ty”.

Wal­lace, who had on­ly re­placed in­cum­bent David John-Williams fol­low­ing elec­tions on No­vem­ber 24, ini­tial­ly chal­lenged the move be­fore CAS in May but even­tu­al­ly re­sort­ed to the lo­cal courts on May 18, af­ter ac­cus­ing CAS of “ap­par­ent in­sti­tu­tion­al bias”.

Trad­ing as the Unit­ed TTFA, Wal­lace and his team claimed that CAS was bi­ased to­wards FI­FA af­ter it had asked them to pay the 40,000 Swiss francs (TT$276,000) in as­so­ci­at­ed costs in­stead of ask­ing FI­FA to pay its share.

How­ev­er, against the back­drop of the High Court’s rul­ing, Bereaux wrote in his judge­ment that the TTFA was bound by its con­sti­tu­tion to re­solve all dis­putes with FI­FA be­fore CAS.

“The fact that such a pro­vi­sion is en­shrined in the TTFA’s Con­sti­tu­tion means that the TTFA and its ex­ec­u­tive are bound to com­ply. The re­sult is that the fil­ing of these pro­ceed­ings was a breach of the TTFA’s Con­sti­tu­tion. Hav­ing made its choice and hav­ing bound it­self by its own Con­sti­tu­tion to com­ply, it can­not now act out­side of its pro­vi­sions,” he said.

In a fur­ther blow, the Court of Ap­peal al­so or­dered the TTFA to pay FI­FA’s le­gal costs.

On­ly re­cent­ly, Wal­lace said if the Court of Ap­peal ruled against the FA, he would walk away with­out chal­leng­ing the rul­ing be­fore the Privy Coun­cil in Lon­don.

“If we lose this mat­ter, that’s it for me. There is no more ap­peal­ing. I [would] say, ‘Thank you very much’, and I walk away. There is noth­ing like that (ap­peal­ing to the Privy Coun­cil). I have no in­ten­tion of go­ing be­yond our court,” he said.

In the in­ter­im, Trinidad and To­ba­go re­main un­der a sus­pen­sion by FI­FA, im­posed on Sep­tem­ber 24 (T&T Re­pub­lic Day) for a “di­rect breach of Ar­ti­cle 59 of the FI­FA Statutes, which ex­press­ly pro­hibits re­course to or­di­nary courts” in dis­putes by mem­ber as­so­ci­a­tions.

In the event, that the sus­pen­sion is not lift­ed by ei­ther FI­FA or the CAS by 5 pm on De­cem­ber 18, T&T will be re­placed by An­tigua and Bar­bu­da as the next high­est-ranked team based on per­for­mances dur­ing the 2019 Con­ca­caf Na­tions League and T&T will al­so miss the qual­i­fy­ing rounds of the 2022 World Cup.

The TTFA is rep­re­sent­ed by at­tor­ney Dr Emir Crowne, Matthew Gayle, Crys­tal Paul and Ja­son Jones, while FI­FA’s le­gal team is Cherie Gopie and M. Hamel-Smith & Co.


LINK ORIGINAL: The Trinidad Guardian

URGENTE: Conoce aquí los Juguetes más vendidos de Amazon >

Más info…

Smart Reputation

Prince Julio César en NYFW 2020

Repara tu reputación en Twitter con Smart Reputation
Repara tu reputación en Twitter con Smart Reputation

Prince Julio Cesar en el New York Fashion Week Spring Summer 2021

Publicidad en Entorno



Smart Reputation