David John-Williams incurs $30M debt » EntornoInteligente
Entornointeligente.com /

For­mer T&T Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (TTFA) pres­i­dent David John-Williams, who is now fac­ing a crim­i­nal probe by po­lice for fi­nan­cial trans­ac­tions dur­ing his TTFA tenure (2015-2019) in con­nec­tion with the Home of Foot­ball project, al­so has a near $30 mil­lion debt weigh­ing heav­i­ly on his shoul­ders. The mil­lions are owed to sev­er­al busi­ness­es in­clud­ing a state en­ti­ty, ac­cord­ing to court doc­u­ments ob­tained by Guardian Me­dia.

In Oc­to­ber of 2019, the San Fer­nan­do High Court hand­ed down a judg­ment of some $23.4 mil­lion to Ven­ture Cred­it Union and or­dered that John-Williams re­pay the mon­ey he was loaned by the in­sti­tu­tion. A month fol­low­ing the rul­ing, the cred­it union had vowed to levy against John-Williams if the loan was not re­paid.

It has been ex­act­ly a year since the rul­ing and Ven­ture Cred­it Union says there has been no at­tempt by John-Williams to re­pay the mon­ey. This prompt­ed the com­pa­ny to post a news­pa­per ad­ver­tise­ment last month re­quest­ing his where­abouts and list­ing his last known ad­dress as LP 1, Point Co­co Es­tate, Irois For­est, Chatham.

The ad was post­ed a few days be­fore a Guardian Me­dia ex­pose en­ti­tled “TTFA’s Se­cret Pana­ma trail”, in which fi­nan­cial de­tails sur­round­ing the Home of Foot­ball in Cou­va were re­vealed af­ter a year-and-a-half-long GML in­ves­ti­ga­tion. Ques­tions were raised in the in­ves­tiga­tive doc­u­men­tary about par­tic­u­lar busi­ness trans­ac­tions John-Williams con­duct­ed dur­ing his stint as TTFA pres­i­dent that were con­nect­ed to the mul­ti-mil­lion-dol­lar fa­cil­i­ty.

Ven­ture Cred­it Union debt

In an in­ter­view with Guardian Me­dia on Sep­tem­ber 18, 2020, Ven­ture Cred­it Union CEO Ramesh Lutch­man con­firmed that the David John-Williams be­ing sought in the press ad was the for­mer TTFA pres­i­dent.

“In an­swer to your ques­tion yes, it is the same per­son,” Lutch­man said.

Guardian Me­dia ques­tioned the pur­pose of the list of per­sons in the ad and Lutch­man in­di­cat­ed, “The pur­pose of the list is to con­tact our mem­bers on mat­ters of mu­tu­al in­ter­est.”

He ad­mit­ted that for months now, it had be­come an oner­ous task try­ing to track down John-Williams.

“Ven­ture Cred­it Union se­cured a judg­ment against Mr John-Williams both through the Com­mis­sion­er of Co­op­er­a­tive De­vel­op­ment and the High Court. We have been un­able to reach Mr John-Williams, as such we are reach­ing out to him pub­licly re­gard­ing a mat­ter of mu­tu­al in­ter­est.”

Guardian Me­dia in­quired whether John-Williams had made any at­tempt to re­pay the out­stand­ing amount in part or whole.

Lutch­man said, “The judg­ment is pub­lic in­for­ma­tion and is yet to be set­tled.”

He said up to Sep­tem­ber 18, John-William had made no at­tempt to com­mu­ni­cate with the cred­it union or had giv­en any in­di­ca­tion of his in­ten­tion to re­pay in a time­ly man­ner.

“The ad­ver­tise­ment is to be con­tin­ued as we await from all per­sons list­ed there­in. Our con­tin­ued course of ac­tion is to con­tin­ue reach­ing out to mem­bers and to pur­sue all avail­able op­tions for the full re­cov­ery of the amount ow­ing.”

Lutch­man said the cred­it union had faced a back­lash of crit­i­cism by their cus­tomers and share­hold­ers alike over this par­tic­u­lar trans­ac­tion. Cred­it union cus­tomers on so­cial me­dia plat­forms, ac­cord­ing to Lutch­man, had been ask­ing how they had not been able to lo­cate this par­tic­u­lar in­di­vid­ual and why they had not been able to levy on John-Williams fol­low­ing the court judge­ment.

In fact, on Oc­to­ber 17 at Ven­ture Cred­it Union’s an­nu­al gen­er­al meet­ing, one per­son asked about de­tails re­gard­ing John-Williams’ loans, in­clud­ing who grant­ed the loan and what col­lat­er­al was of­fered for the loan when it was grant­ed.

Two days be­fore we spoke to Lutch­man, a copy of the judge­ment was sent to John-Williams via What­sApp. Guardian Me­dia asked, “Was this set­tled as yet, Mr John-Williams?” John-Williams read the mes­sage as in­di­cat­ed by two blue ticks but nev­er re­spond­ed.

Sources fa­mil­iar with the mat­ter said in ear­ly Oc­to­ber af­ter the pub­li­ca­tion of the ad­ver­tise­ment, John-Williams’ lawyer Anand Misir wrote to Ven­ture Cred­it Union claim­ing li­bel­lous pub­li­ca­tion.

Guardian Me­dia un­der­stands there were over­tures by John-Williams in 2019 through a let­ter from his at­tor­ney to re­pay the mon­ey at some point. But noth­ing has ma­te­ri­alised to date.

The $23.4 mil­lion, ac­cord­ing to peo­ple fa­mil­iar with the case, em­anat­ed from a se­ries of loans tak­en some­time from 2012 to 2015 by John-Williams. The cred­it union ini­ti­at­ed le­gal ac­tion in 2016 and se­cured judg­ment three years lat­er.

In­ter-com­mer­cial Bank waits too

But this trend does not end there, as Guardian Me­dia dis­cov­ered dur­ing its in­ves­ti­ga­tion. There were oth­er judge­ments hand­ed down by the High Court against John-Williams and none of the mon­ey has been re­paid to the en­ti­ties in­volved to date.

The In­ter-com­mer­cial Bank, now known as (JMMB), was award­ed a judge­ment against John-Williams on Sep­tem­ber 22, 2015, to the tune of $1,599,403.99 mil­lion. That claim, which Guardian Me­dia ob­tained a copy of, was re-reg­is­tered on Feb­ru­ary 12, 2019, in the High Court. Usu­al­ly, claimants tend to re-reg­is­ter a judge­ment so that it will main­tain pri­or­i­ty over judge­ments reg­is­tered by oth­er judge­ment cred­i­tors over the same debtor, in this case, John-Williams.

Guardian Me­dia reached out to a se­nior rep­re­sen­ta­tive of JMMB on Oc­to­ber 12 to in­quire about the sta­tus of the judge­ment. Af­ter ver­i­fy­ing with the bank’s le­gal de­part­ment, the fe­male se­nior ex­ec­u­tive, who wished not to be named, said, “We’ve been re­fil­ing over the years, that should tell you we have not re­ceived any mon­ey to date.”

NIB won’t di­vulge client in­fo

In May 2016, the Na­tion­al In­sur­ance Board was al­so award­ed a judge­ment by the High Court in the sum of $2,569,929.31 mil­lion against de­fen­dants David John-Williams and his broth­ers Patrick John-Williams and Christo­pher John-Williams.

The judge­ment stat­ed the name of the per­son whose es­tate is in­tend­ed to be af­fect­ed was David John-Williams.

This judge­ment was re-reg­is­tered in Au­gust of 2018 with the fig­ure now stand­ing at $2,730,418.73m, as in­ter­est of rough­ly six per cent per an­num is added on to the out­stand­ing amount. Re-reg­is­ter­ing a judge­ment ef­fec­tive­ly means the mon­ey is still out­stand­ing and must be done at least every three years to en­sure the judge­ment main­tains pri­or­i­ty.

On Oc­to­ber 12, Guardian Me­dia con­tact­ed the of­fice of NIB ex­ec­u­tive di­rec­tor Niala Per­sad-Po­li­ah to in­quire about whether the NIB had been re­paid. A per­son at Per­sad-Po­li­ah’s of­fice in­di­cat­ed she was out of of­fice but they would re­lay the mes­sage. On Oc­to­ber 22, NIB’s Cor­po­rate Com­mu­ni­ca­tions man­ag­er Tri­cia Clarke con­tact­ed Guardian Me­dia about the mat­ter. Clarke said due to client/cus­tomer con­fi­den­tial­i­ty “we can’t di­vulge any in­for­ma­tion.”

In a sep­a­rate mat­ter in­volv­ing the NIB, TTFA em­ploy­ees have al­leged that dur­ing his tenure as TTFA pres­i­dent, the ad­min­is­tra­tion with­held some $4 mil­lion due to the NIB and the Min­istry of Fi­nance for PAYE, NIS and health sur­charge for em­ploy­ees.

Guardian Me­dia al­so un­der­stands two oth­er court judge­ments were award­ed to Massy Ma­chin­ery Lim­it­ed in June 2015 (CV2015-00572) in the sum of $493,986.07 and to Gor­don Win­ter Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed in Feb­ru­ary 2011 (CV2009-00731) in the sum of $497,425.40) both against John-Williams. How­ev­er, we could not as­cer­tain whether these claims had been set­tled.

No re­sponse from John-Williams

Guardian Me­dia sent sev­er­al ques­tions to John-Williams via What­sApp sur­round­ing the judge­ments and if there had been any at­tempt by him to re­pay the busi­ness en­ti­ties in­volved.

The ques­tions were sent twice on Oc­to­ber 20 for John-Williams. At 12.37 pm when the ques­tions were first sent, he read the mes­sages as in­di­cat­ed by a blue tick but did not re­spond. The ques­tions were again sent that day at 7.42 pm. The fol­low­ing day, the ques­tions were again sent at 7.46 am and 10.47 am but there was no re­sponse. The ques­tions were again sent twice the fol­low­ing day and still there was no re­sponse.

Ques­tions for John-Williams:

Good morn­ing again Mr John-Williams, I hope you are keep­ing safe. I am send­ing my ques­tions again.

1. I am ask­ing for the record once again for a sto­ry that I am work­ing on as it re­lates to Ven­ture Cred­it Union and if any at­tempts have been made to re­pay the monies owed af­ter the Pub­lic court judg­ment. Se­nior of­fi­cials at Ven­ture speak­ing on the record said you have not made any pay­ment to date. Can you just in­di­cate if you have or have not?

2. Al­so, I have spo­ken to of­fi­cials at In­ter-com­mer­cial Bank, which was al­so award­ed a judge­ment against you in the sum of $1.599m since 2015. They have in­di­cat­ed that they have had to re-reg­is­ter the claim since they have not re­ceived any pay­ment to date. Based on this Pub­lic court doc­u­ment I have in my pos­ses­sion, can you say if any at­tempt has been made to ini­ti­ate pay­ment? A sim­ple yes or no will suf­fice, please.

3. Al­so, the Na­tion­al In­sur­ance Board (NIB) was award­ed a judge­ment against you and broth­ers Patrick John-Williams and Christo­pher John Williams in May 2016 in the sum of $2.73m. This Pub­lic court doc­u­ment which I al­so ob­tained shows the claim was re-reg­is­tered in Au­gust 2018. Have you made any at­tempts to pay NIB since then?

4. Al­so, have you set­tled the court judg­ments award­ed to Massy Ma­chin­ery Ltd in June 2015 for the sum of $493,986.07 and Gor­don Win­ter Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed in Feb­ru­ary 2011 to the sum of $497,425.40? A sim­ple yes or no would suf­fice since these court doc­u­ments are all pub­lic.

LINK ORIGINAL: The Trinidad Guardian


URGENTE: Conoce aquí los Juguetes más vendidos de Amazon >

Más info…

Smart Reputation

Prince Julio César en NYFW 2020

Repara tu reputación en Twitter con Smart Reputation
Repara tu reputación en Twitter con Smart Reputation

Prince Julio Cesar en el New York Fashion Week Spring Summer 2021

Publicidad en Entorno



Smart Reputation